Natural Resources Management and Policy at Texas A & M University-College Station

College Station, TX · Public · Bachelor's Degree
48 /100
DegreeOutlook Score (Base Case) — assumes in-state tuition
49
Optimistic
48
Base Case
48
Pessimistic
Earnings $30,362/yr (-18% vs median)
AI Risk High (42% exposed)
Job Market Very Large (310,400 openings/yr)
ROI 11.5x earnings multiple (3.8x out-of-state)
Ranked #15 of 26 Natural Resources Management and Policy programs

How AI Changes the Outlook

Three scenarios based on how aggressively AI disrupts the career paths available to Natural Resources Management and Policy graduates.

Optimistic
No Disruption
Base Case
Gradual AI
Pessimistic
Aggressive AI
10-Year Earnings $616K $605K $551K
Earnings Multiple (In-State) 11.8x 11.5x 10.5x
Earnings Multiple (Out-of-State) 3.8x 3.8x 3.4x
Probability of Field Employment 49% 45% 35%
DegreeOutlook Score 49 48 48

10-Year Earnings Projection

*Year 1 uses actual reported earnings. Scenarios diverge as AI impact compounds over time.

4-Year Tuition, In-State (Sticker)
$52,396
Out-of-state: $161,312 (3.8x ROI)
4-Year Net Price (After Aid)
$83,696
-60% less than sticker · See by income
Median Debt at Graduation
$21,657
8.6 months of Year 1 earnings
Reported Earnings (5 Year)
$60,521
99% growth from Year 1

Program Analysis

First-year earnings of $30,362 place Texas A & M University-College Station below the $37,130 national median for Natural Resources Management and Policy — worth weighing against tuition and cost of living.

The 11.5x earnings multiple means ten-year projected earnings exceed tuition cost by an order of magnitude. By pure financial math, this is a standout.

AI risk is moderate — 42% task exposure — and the 11% scenario spread suggests disruption would dent but not destroy the earnings outlook.

The $21,657 debt-to-$30,362 income ratio translates to about 9 months of earnings. Standard loan terms should handle this comfortably.

At #15 out of 26 programs, Texas A & M University-College Station's financial outcomes for Natural Resources Management and Policy trail the majority of peers. The value case depends on other factors.

Earnings growth from $30,362 to $60,521 over five years (99% increase) indicates that graduates in this field see meaningful salary progression.

About Texas A & M University-College Station

A 63% admission rate makes Texas A & M University-College Station accessible to a wide range of qualified students, one of the larger campuses at 59,099 students in College Station, TX.

See all programs and financial aid at Texas A & M University-College Station →

Top Career Paths

Managers, all other $136,550/yr
Economics teachers, postsecondary $119,980/yr
Economists $115,440/yr
View all 19 career paths with salary ranges and AI risk →

Compare & Explore

Natural Resources Management and Policy at Other Schools

Other Majors at Texas A & M University-College Station

Consider the Trade Route?

Trade programs often mean less time in school, lower student debt, and hands-on career paths that tend to be more resilient to AI disruption.

Frequently Asked Questions

How does Texas A & M University-College Station's Natural Resources Management and Policy program score?
This program scores 48/100 — on the lower end for Natural Resources Management and Policy. Prospective students should carefully weigh costs against likely earnings.
How vulnerable is Natural Resources Management and Policy to AI automation?
AI won't 'replace' Natural Resources Management and Policy careers outright, but it is likely to reduce the number of job openings. We model 42% task exposure, which compresses field employment probability in our scenarios.
Why are Natural Resources Management and Policy earnings lower at Texas A & M University-College Station?
Lower starting pay at Texas A & M University-College Station may reflect local labor market conditions rather than program quality. Many graduates see convergence with national averages within 3-5 years.
Scores use College Scorecard earnings, BLS employment projections, and AI task-exposure research. See full methodology →