Home › University of Chicago › Statistics

Statistics at University of Chicago

Chicago, IL · Private nonprofit · Bachelor's Degree
63 /100
DegreeOutlook Score (Base Case)
64
Optimistic
63
Base Case
58
Pessimistic
Earnings $82,681/yr (31% vs median)
AI Risk Very High (64% exposed)
Job Market Large (41,500 openings/yr)
ROI 4.8x earnings multiple
Ranked #18 of 51 Statistics programs Top 50%

How AI Changes the Outlook

Three scenarios based on how aggressively AI disrupts the career paths available to Statistics graduates.

Optimistic
No Disruption		 Base Case
Gradual AI		 Pessimistic
Aggressive AI
10-Year Earnings $1,367K $1,285K $953K
Earnings Multiple 5.1x 4.8x 3.6x
Probability of Field Employment 71% 64% 40%
DegreeOutlook Score 64 63 58

10-Year Earnings Projection

*Year 1 uses actual reported earnings. Scenarios diverge as AI impact compounds over time.

4-Year Tuition (Sticker)
$267,756
4-Year Net Price (After Aid)
$75,868
72% less than sticker · See by income
Reported Earnings (5 Year)
$147,558
78% growth from Year 1

Program Analysis

Graduates of University of Chicago's Statistics program earn $82,681/yr in their first year — 31% above the $63,187 national median, a strong market signal for this institution.

At 4.8x tuition cost in decade earnings, the ROI is moderate. This program pays for itself, but it's not a financial slam-dunk.

Career paths for Statistics carry above-average AI exposure (64% of tasks). The 30% scenario spread means the difference between optimistic and pessimistic outcomes is substantial.

A #18 ranking among 51 Statistics programs places University of Chicago in the middle-to-upper range. Solid, not exceptional.

The $82,681-to-$147,558 earnings arc over five years reflects a 78% gain — well above average career growth for recent graduates.

About University of Chicago

University of Chicago admits 5% of applicants — among the most selective institutions in the country, serving 7,540 students in Chicago, IL. The average net cost of $75,868 over four years represents a 72% discount from published tuition.

See all programs and financial aid at University of Chicago →

Top Career Paths

Natural sciences managers $161,180/yr
Actuaries $125,770/yr
Mathematicians $121,680/yr
View all 7 career paths with salary ranges and AI risk →

Compare & Explore

Compare this program → View all 51 schools offering Statistics →

Statistics at Other Schools

Harvard University ($141,116) University of Pennsylvania ($129,732) Duke University ($97,197) Carnegie Mellon University ($93,111) University of California-Berkeley ($83,227) Cornell University ($82,531) Northwestern University ($77,917) Southern Methodist University ($76,759)

Other Majors at University of Chicago

Computer Science ($117,578) Mathematics ($100,421) Economics ($92,075) Public Policy Analysis ($60,057) Political Science and Government ($56,022) History ($46,616) English Language and Literature, General ($44,397) Clinical, Counseling and Applied Psychology ($39,808)

Is a Trade Program a Better Fit?

Compare Statistics trade programs on TradeSchoolWorth →

For students who prefer applied learning, trade programs can deliver strong earnings with significantly less debt and shorter time to employment.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does a 63/100 DegreeOutlook Score mean for Statistics at University of Chicago?
At 63/100, University of Chicago's Statistics program delivers middling returns. School cost and personal fit become important decision factors.
Should I worry about AI if I study Statistics at University of Chicago?
The 64% AI task exposure score is above average. Our model shows this affecting job availability more than salaries — graduates may face stiffer competition for fewer positions.
What do students actually pay for Statistics at University of Chicago?
The 72% gap between sticker price and net cost means most students pay far less than $267,756. At a net cost of $75,868, the earnings multiple improves substantially.
Scores use College Scorecard earnings, BLS employment projections, and AI task-exposure research. See full methodology →