Wildlife and Wildlands Science and Management at University of Georgia

Athens, GA · Public · Bachelor's Degree
20 /100
DegreeOutlook Score (Base Case) — assumes in-state tuition
20
Optimistic
20
Base Case
18
Pessimistic
Earnings $22,354/yr (-25% vs median)
AI Risk High (48% exposed)
Job Market Small (4,000 openings/yr)
ROI 11.4x earnings multiple (4.2x out-of-state)
Ranked #27 of 37 Wildlife and Wildlands Science and Management programs

How AI Changes the Outlook

Three scenarios based on how aggressively AI disrupts the career paths available to Wildlife and Wildlands Science and Management graduates.

Optimistic
No Disruption
Base Case
Gradual AI
Pessimistic
Aggressive AI
10-Year Earnings $511K $509K $475K
Earnings Multiple (In-State) 11.4x 11.4x 10.6x
Earnings Multiple (Out-of-State) 4.2x 4.2x 3.9x
Probability of Field Employment 49% 44% 33%
DegreeOutlook Score 20 20 18

10-Year Earnings Projection

*Year 1 uses actual reported earnings. Scenarios diverge as AI impact compounds over time.

4-Year Tuition, In-State (Sticker)
$44,720
Out-of-state: $120,880 (4.2x ROI)
4-Year Net Price (After Aid)
$55,264
-24% less than sticker · See by income
Median Debt at Graduation
$22,000
11.8 months of Year 1 earnings
Reported Earnings (5 Year)
$43,583
95% growth from Year 1

Program Analysis

First-year earnings of $22,354 place University of Georgia below the $29,850 national median for Wildlife and Wildlands Science and Management — worth weighing against tuition and cost of living.

With a 11.4x return on in-state tuition over ten years, the financial case for this program is compelling by virtually any measure.

The 7% difference between AI scenarios reflects partial automation exposure. Some Wildlife and Wildlands Science and Management career paths face displacement, but others in the field are more insulated.

At $22,000 against $22,354/yr in earnings, the debt burden is moderate. Most graduates should manage repayment without extended financial strain.

A #27 ranking among 37 Wildlife and Wildlands Science and Management programs places University of Georgia in the lower half. Price, proximity, and personal fit become the stronger arguments.

The $22,354-to-$43,583 earnings arc over five years reflects a 95% gain — well above average career growth for recent graduates.

About University of Georgia

University of Georgia accepts 37% of applicants — selective, though not ultra-competitive, with 31,310 students enrolled in Athens, GA.

See all programs and financial aid at University of Georgia →

Top Career Paths

Forestry and conservation science teachers, postsecondary $100,830/yr
Zoologists and wildlife biologists $72,860/yr
Conservation scientists $67,950/yr
View all 3 career paths with salary ranges and AI risk →

Compare & Explore

Wildlife and Wildlands Science and Management at Other Schools

Other Majors at University of Georgia

Is a Trade Program a Better Fit?

For students who prefer applied learning, trade programs can deliver strong earnings with significantly less debt and shorter time to employment.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does a 20/100 DegreeOutlook Score mean for Wildlife and Wildlands Science and Management at University of Georgia?
At 20/100, the financial outlook is modest. Higher-scoring Wildlife and Wildlands Science and Management programs exist, though non-financial factors may justify this choice.
Should I worry about AI if I study Wildlife and Wildlands Science and Management at University of Georgia?
The 48% AI task exposure score is above average. Our model shows this affecting job availability more than salaries — graduates may face stiffer competition for fewer positions.
Is University of Georgia a good choice for Wildlife and Wildlands Science and Management despite lower starting pay?
Starting salary is one data point. If University of Georgia's tuition is significantly below average, the ROI calculation can still work — lower earnings paired with lower costs can be a reasonable trade.
Scores use College Scorecard earnings, BLS employment projections, and AI task-exposure research. See full methodology →